In my graduate seminar class, we have been studying various essays on the value of a MFA (Masters of Fine Arts) degree. In our discussions, I see a trend to apply the MFA as a way of identifying art practice on a higher level based on critical analysis, history and conceptual approach, a way of descerning conceptual artists from hobbyists such as bead making, quilting, scrapbooking, pottery etc.
It seems that educated or degreed artists are assuming the role of art patrons spoken of by critic Clement Greenberg in his 1939 essay, Avant Garde and Kitsch. The cultured class values of that era are not as prevalent in contemporary culture and those who can afford art buy pre-existing pieces rather than pay to have it created as in the past. The baton of critical art discussion is being assumed by the university artisans who debate aesthetics.
What drives art in the 21st century? Is it appreciation of traditional forms of art such as painting and sculpture or the allure of art making using commercial products and processes by the average hobbyist? Can such a small group of people such as university artisans keep art interests alive or will it be the larger population who's creativity ranges from macramé to scrapbooking?
1 comment:
شركة عزل اسطح بالخبر
Post a Comment